The Delhi High Court on Tuesday restrained Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) from taking any coercive action, including terminating its power purchase agreement, against Reliance NU Suntech till it decided the case.
The court while issuing notice to SECI on Reliance NU Suntech's plea asked parties to maintain status quo and posted the matter for further hearing on September 17.
Stating that the July 1 Show Cause Notice issued by SECI was “perverse” and issued with a “predetermined and premeditated mind,” Reliance NU said that its relationship with Reliance Power was fully disclosed in the bid and even the SECI’s documents, letters and correspondence showed that they were aware of all material facts and circumstances.
SECI and Reliance NU Suntech, a subsidiary of Reliance Power, had entered into Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in April for setting up of 2000 MW ISTS-Connected Solar PV Power Projects with 1000 MW/4000 MWh Energy Storage Systems under Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding. Later, in July, SECI had issued a show cause notice to Reliance NU for terminating the PPA on the ground that it had not informed about the debarment of Reliance NU BESS, another Reliance Power subsidiary, in a fake bank guarantee (BG) documents case involving a different tender.
SECI was fully aware of the relationship and “correctly and consciously” considered Reliance NU to be eligible, the petition stated. “As an afterthought after having signed the Power Purchase Agreement and taking a performance bank guarantee of Rs 377.58 crore and success fees amounting to Rs 10.04 crore, SECI has issued an illegal show cause notice, seeking to terminate the PPA of April 30,” Reliance NU submitted.
“Because suppression necessarily involves the other party being unaware of a particular fact and relying on the omission to its detriment. If the alleging party here already had full knowledge and therefore the allegation of suppression has to fail,” the petition filed through counsel Rishi Agrawala and Devika Mohan stated.
In the fake GB case last year, SECI had debarred Nu Bess in November. The HC had stayed the debarment order of Reliance Power and its subsidiary companies, except for Reliance NU BESS.
The court while issuing notice to SECI on Reliance NU Suntech's plea asked parties to maintain status quo and posted the matter for further hearing on September 17.
Stating that the July 1 Show Cause Notice issued by SECI was “perverse” and issued with a “predetermined and premeditated mind,” Reliance NU said that its relationship with Reliance Power was fully disclosed in the bid and even the SECI’s documents, letters and correspondence showed that they were aware of all material facts and circumstances.
SECI and Reliance NU Suntech, a subsidiary of Reliance Power, had entered into Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) in April for setting up of 2000 MW ISTS-Connected Solar PV Power Projects with 1000 MW/4000 MWh Energy Storage Systems under Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding. Later, in July, SECI had issued a show cause notice to Reliance NU for terminating the PPA on the ground that it had not informed about the debarment of Reliance NU BESS, another Reliance Power subsidiary, in a fake bank guarantee (BG) documents case involving a different tender.
SECI was fully aware of the relationship and “correctly and consciously” considered Reliance NU to be eligible, the petition stated. “As an afterthought after having signed the Power Purchase Agreement and taking a performance bank guarantee of Rs 377.58 crore and success fees amounting to Rs 10.04 crore, SECI has issued an illegal show cause notice, seeking to terminate the PPA of April 30,” Reliance NU submitted.
“Because suppression necessarily involves the other party being unaware of a particular fact and relying on the omission to its detriment. If the alleging party here already had full knowledge and therefore the allegation of suppression has to fail,” the petition filed through counsel Rishi Agrawala and Devika Mohan stated.
In the fake GB case last year, SECI had debarred Nu Bess in November. The HC had stayed the debarment order of Reliance Power and its subsidiary companies, except for Reliance NU BESS.
You may also like
Ambush on Texas ICE agents: 10 charged with attempted murder; 'not a peaceful protest', says US attorney
Mumbai Weather Update: IMD Predicts Relief From Heavy Rain After July 9; Water Stock In 7 Lakes Rises To 71%
NRIs in UAE: Is opening a grocery store in India a good idea?
Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal steps in as human customer support executive after viral post slams its automated system
Little Lioness army roar for England 800-miles away as team takes on the Dutch
