As the NFL marches deeper into its regular season, an uncomfortable reality begins to surface for many fans: a sense of dullness in the final weeks. With some teams already booked for the playoffs and others completely out of contention, late-season matchups can start to feel like glorified exhibitions. The stakes diminish, intensity drops, and the excitement that defines NFL Sundays wanes. In some cases, it turns into “garbage time” football — with stars sitting out and coaching staffs tinkering with lineups rather than competing with urgency.
Can a playoff seeding shake-up turn ordinary NFL closing games into epic showdowns?
This issue, while not new, has reignited serious conversation thanks to a bold proposal from the Detroit Lions. The franchise has questioned a long-standing NFL tradition: automatically awarding a home playoff game to every division winner. Their motion to alter this rule was tabled during the latest league meetings, but not without making waves — especially since it gained visible support from none other than NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell .
According to NFL.com’s Tom Pelissero, no vote was held on Detroit's proposal, but that doesn’t mean it’s off the table. In fact, insiders confirmed that some team executives favored the idea, and more crucially, Goodell himself "became visibly irritated at the resistance to the measure" during the discussions. It’s a rare public glimpse into the Commissioner’s passionate stance on a topic that could change postseason football as we know it.
“I thought it is a very healthy proposal and a very healthy point that we need to evaluate and continue to look at,” Goodell remarked, via CBS Sports’ Jonathan Jones. “There was some great data to show that we should really look at some form or version of this.”
At the heart of the debate lies a simple question: Should winning a division be enough to earn a home playoff game — even if the team finishes with a losing record? In recent years, we’ve seen teams stumble into the postseason with sub-.500 records only to host opponents with significantly better win-loss tallies. This not only raises fairness concerns but also dilutes the drama of the season’s closing act. A team could lose a meaningless Week 18 matchup and still stroll into January with a home-field advantage.
Goodell’s push for change is motivated by a desire to keep competition alive through the very last snap of the regular season. The looming expansion to an 18-game schedule makes this even more urgent. The earlier teams clinch divisions, the more likely they are to rest starters — robbing fans of marquee matchups and leaving broadcasters and sponsors wanting more.
While the proposal hasn’t been voted on yet, insiders suggest it may resurface in May. One source noted that when the league supports an idea, it often gets “tabled when the [Competition Committee] or Roger didn’t want the L.”
One possible compromise could involve stripping sub-.500 division winners of the right to host Wild Card games or implementing a reseeding system post-Wild Card weekend. Though some argue this would devalue the act of winning a division, the move could inject new life into the final weeks and reignite late-season excitement.
Whether Goodell’s vision becomes reality remains to be seen. But his refusal to dismiss the Lions’ proposal signals a seismic shift in the league’s mindset — and perhaps, the beginning of a new playoff era.
Also Read: Patrick Mahomes almost quit football before becoming the Chiefs’ franchise quarterback—His mom Randi's words remind us why he didn’t
Can a playoff seeding shake-up turn ordinary NFL closing games into epic showdowns?
This issue, while not new, has reignited serious conversation thanks to a bold proposal from the Detroit Lions. The franchise has questioned a long-standing NFL tradition: automatically awarding a home playoff game to every division winner. Their motion to alter this rule was tabled during the latest league meetings, but not without making waves — especially since it gained visible support from none other than NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell .
According to NFL.com’s Tom Pelissero, no vote was held on Detroit's proposal, but that doesn’t mean it’s off the table. In fact, insiders confirmed that some team executives favored the idea, and more crucially, Goodell himself "became visibly irritated at the resistance to the measure" during the discussions. It’s a rare public glimpse into the Commissioner’s passionate stance on a topic that could change postseason football as we know it.
“I thought it is a very healthy proposal and a very healthy point that we need to evaluate and continue to look at,” Goodell remarked, via CBS Sports’ Jonathan Jones. “There was some great data to show that we should really look at some form or version of this.”
At the heart of the debate lies a simple question: Should winning a division be enough to earn a home playoff game — even if the team finishes with a losing record? In recent years, we’ve seen teams stumble into the postseason with sub-.500 records only to host opponents with significantly better win-loss tallies. This not only raises fairness concerns but also dilutes the drama of the season’s closing act. A team could lose a meaningless Week 18 matchup and still stroll into January with a home-field advantage.
Goodell’s push for change is motivated by a desire to keep competition alive through the very last snap of the regular season. The looming expansion to an 18-game schedule makes this even more urgent. The earlier teams clinch divisions, the more likely they are to rest starters — robbing fans of marquee matchups and leaving broadcasters and sponsors wanting more.
While the proposal hasn’t been voted on yet, insiders suggest it may resurface in May. One source noted that when the league supports an idea, it often gets “tabled when the [Competition Committee] or Roger didn’t want the L.”
One possible compromise could involve stripping sub-.500 division winners of the right to host Wild Card games or implementing a reseeding system post-Wild Card weekend. Though some argue this would devalue the act of winning a division, the move could inject new life into the final weeks and reignite late-season excitement.
Whether Goodell’s vision becomes reality remains to be seen. But his refusal to dismiss the Lions’ proposal signals a seismic shift in the league’s mindset — and perhaps, the beginning of a new playoff era.
Also Read: Patrick Mahomes almost quit football before becoming the Chiefs’ franchise quarterback—His mom Randi's words remind us why he didn’t
You may also like
Queen Camilla reveals the sweet secret to happy marriage with King Charles after 20th anniversary
Leadership Success Story: Sushira Somavarapu's High-Value Actions Project Transforms Customer Experience Analytics
Kash Patel removed as acting ATF chief, replaced by Army secretary Daniel Driscoll
Raphinha equals incredible Lionel Messi record to leave Barcelona on the brink
Platform Engineering In The Cloud: Creating Infrastructure For The Next Generation Of LoT By Anupam Ojha