NEW DELHI: In a significant ruling to protect public servants discharging their duties, Supreme Court held that protection provided to them, which prevents prosecution without govt's prior sanction, would apply even in cases where officials exceed their official powers. The court stated excessiveness alone cannot strip them of this safeguard.
A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma said a plain reading of Section 170 of Police Act reveals the legislature has sought to afford a statutory safeguard to certain public functionaries, and if any offence is alleged to have been committed by such officials while discharging their duties then no court shall entertain any prosecution or suit against them without govt's prior sanction.
"Importantly, the protective umbrella of Section 170 is not confined solely to acts strictly within the bounds of authority but extends to acts done ostensibly in excess of such authority, so long as there exists a reasonable nexus between the act complained of and the discharge of official functions," the bench said, while accepting the plea of senior advocate Rahul Kaushik who submitted that even the offence of use of excessive power by public servant would fall within the ambit of Section 170 for which sanction was needed.
The safeguard under Section 197 of CrPC and Section 170 of Police Act is limited. It applies only if the alleged act is reasonably connected to the officer's official duties. The law does not offer protection if the official role is used as a mere excuse to commit wrongful acts. However, it was held that the protection of prior sanction will be available when there is a reasonable connection between the act and the duty.
"While enunciating when the protection of prior sanction will be applicable, this court has held that even if a police officer exceeds his official powers, as long as there is a reasonable connection between the act and his duty, they are still entitled to the protection requiring prior sanction. Excessiveness alone does not strip them of this safeguard," the court said.
The court was hearing pleas of cops challenging their prosecution on grounds that sanction was not taken before initiating criminal proceedings against them for abusing their official power and assaulting a person.
A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma said a plain reading of Section 170 of Police Act reveals the legislature has sought to afford a statutory safeguard to certain public functionaries, and if any offence is alleged to have been committed by such officials while discharging their duties then no court shall entertain any prosecution or suit against them without govt's prior sanction.
"Importantly, the protective umbrella of Section 170 is not confined solely to acts strictly within the bounds of authority but extends to acts done ostensibly in excess of such authority, so long as there exists a reasonable nexus between the act complained of and the discharge of official functions," the bench said, while accepting the plea of senior advocate Rahul Kaushik who submitted that even the offence of use of excessive power by public servant would fall within the ambit of Section 170 for which sanction was needed.
The safeguard under Section 197 of CrPC and Section 170 of Police Act is limited. It applies only if the alleged act is reasonably connected to the officer's official duties. The law does not offer protection if the official role is used as a mere excuse to commit wrongful acts. However, it was held that the protection of prior sanction will be available when there is a reasonable connection between the act and the duty.
"While enunciating when the protection of prior sanction will be applicable, this court has held that even if a police officer exceeds his official powers, as long as there is a reasonable connection between the act and his duty, they are still entitled to the protection requiring prior sanction. Excessiveness alone does not strip them of this safeguard," the court said.
The court was hearing pleas of cops challenging their prosecution on grounds that sanction was not taken before initiating criminal proceedings against them for abusing their official power and assaulting a person.
You may also like
Ramayan Path to be organised on Ashtami and Navami in 58 Dev Tirths of Sambhal, says DM
Faulty policy: Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa CM slams Pak govt's decision to deport Aghan refugees
Malaysian PM tells Ilaiyaraaja: May the concert here be another historic moment in your artistic journey
PM Modi receives historic guard of honour in Sri Lanka, meets President Dissanayake in Colombo (WATCH)
Meghalaya Board 10th Result 2025 declared, this much percentage pass, students check their result like this.
